Media Double Standards: Unpacking Hypocrisy

A Glaring Question of Double Standards?

Today, our focus turns to a particular corner of the cable news landscape of The Very Tired An (Inauthentic) Show: Morning Joe AKA Barnacles of Bull****! A significant point of contention revolves around the show’s hosts and a perceived hypocrisy in network standards. There are allegations of an affair between the colleagues. Critics are quick to point out a stark contrast in how this situation was handled compared to the dismissal of Amy Robach and T.J. Holmes, former hosts of Good Morning America, whose relationship led to their termination.

This has led to the assertion that a different standard of fairness is applied based on race. The argument is that had the hosts in question been Black, the network would have swiftly removed them, just as ABC did in a similar situation. This raises a fundamental question about equity and whether the rules apply the same to everyone in the media landscape.

“Certified Puppets“

The criticism extends beyond just the hosts to the guests who frequent the program. Online pundits pulls no punches, suggesting that any person of color on the network is a “certified puppet,” implying they must compromise their integrity to maintain their position on MSNBC. This sentiment is directly aimed at prominent figures like Reverend Al Sharpton, with one critic stating he looks “like a puppet every time he appears on that show”. The advice given is blunt: appearing on the show is damaging to one’s credibility and cachet.

Most critiques suggests that for some, the platform isn’t a space for genuine discourse but a stage where certain roles must be played, potentially at the cost of one’s own voice and influence.

Strategy, Spectacle, and Stale Bread

Beyond the personalities, the very substance of the show is called into question. Some viewers see it as a platform for “fake right wing nepo nitwits disguising themselves as progressive”. The content is dismissed as “stale white bread” and, more crudely, as “Barnacles of Bull****”.

The show’s political analysis is also criticized for its focus on a specific narrative. For example, its discussion of Donald Trump’s strategy is seen as centering on the projection of “perceived strength” and the manipulation of public fear for political advantage, especially in suburban and red-state areas. One analyst is even described as one of the “three stooges” Mika, Joe and Chris Matthews for framing a political move as a “win for Trump” simply because in their eyes it projects an image of strength. This raises concerns that the show prioritizes political spectacle over substantive data and genuine inquiry. 

Ultimately, the collective voice of these critiques culminates in a call for viewers to withdraw their support. The hope is that if viewership declines, the show might “just fade off into the sunset,” like it should have a long time ago, prompting a change in a media ecosystem that many feel is fundamentally flawed. ~Balance Due